It is not always easy to distinguish which types of teaching resources and strategies are best for English Language Learners (ELLs), or Multilingual Language Learners (MLLs).
I think part of the confusion – at least for elementary teachers in Ontario – stems from the fact that ELLs join mainstream classrooms and acquire English from program adaptations (accommodations and modifications) and immersion rather than from a separate ESL curriculum.
As an educator with a background in teaching English abroad, it was a new concept for me to teach literacy and numeracy to ELLs through a core curriculum designed for non-ELLs. It took me a long time to figure out how to best support the newcomer ELLs in the grade 7 homeroom I was assigned.
As someone who has worked in ESL and ELD support in schools for many years, I still get a lot of questions from homeroom teachers about how they can best teach the ELLs in their classes. Which resources are appropriate for ELLs? How are they supposed to teach English as an additional language while also teaching literacy? What’s the difference?
Language Arts vs. Language Acquisition
Understanding the difference language arts and language acquisition is key to knowing which resources to use, and how to use them.
Language Arts curriculum and resources are typically designed for students that already have a foundation of English language skills. They assume that students can draw from an existing repertoire of words and vocabulary to make meaning from texts and communicate ideas.
Language acquisition resources, or those that fall under the “ESL” (English as a Second Language) or “EAL” (English as an additional language) umbrella, are designed for students with emergent vocabularies in English (or whatever the target language is). They are designed to help students build practical communication skills, learn different verb tenses, and build vocabulary in familiar and academic contexts.
Language Arts and English language acquisition resources may often intersect in terms of content, though they cannot wholly be substituted for one another. For example, levelled texts for ELLs are designed for beginner readers in English so that they are more likely to encounter familiar or simpler verb tenses and new vocabulary at a rate that is appropriate for a student at a particular levels of English language proficiency. While these texts may be readable and enjoyable for non-ELLs, they may not contain the kind of figurative language and vocabulary that will help a non-ELL to develop skills of literary and text analysis.
Literary texts, including many stories for young children, are not designed with the ELL in mind. They may contain complex verb tenses and constructions, even when written for younger kids. ELLs can certainly read and enjoy such texts, but they may need additional support and context to understand the usage of verbs and references.
What About Literacy Resources to Support Decoding and Phonological Awareness?
As we are increasingly immersed in foundational literacy resources designed to teach decoding through phonological awareness in the language arts classroom, I think it can be tempting to use them as language acquisition resources – which they can be – but with adaptation and tweaking.
Foundational literacy resources that focus on phonemic and phonological awareness are largely designed for non-ELLs. They assume that students are already familiar with the sounds of English. And yes, these resources will be beneficial to ELLs, but much of the resources do not focus on teaching meaning. So when using these resources with ELLs, it is important to provide ELLs with opportunities to learn the meanings of the words they are decoding.
Final Thoughts
Knowing the difference between English Language Arts and English Language Acquisition resources is important, especially in teaching contexts where the differences can be blurred. Understanding which resources will serve your purpose best, or how to use both types of resources flexibly in your classroom, will help you to plan literacy and language programs effectively.
