I had the opportunity to participate in professional development focused on amplifying First Nations, Metis and Indigenous (FNMI) voices in the classroom. This professional development was timely, considering the revised Ontario language curriculum is now focused on approaching learning through a CRRP (Culturally Responsive and Relevant Pedagogy) lens. Strand A, ‘Applications, connections and contributions’ highlights that:
Students apply language and literacy skills in various contexts, and make connections to the contributions of a diversity of voices, experiences and perspectives, including those of First Nations, Métis and Inuit individuals, communities, groups and nations. (Ontario Language Curriculum, 2023)
As a racialized educator and settler, I really appreciate this change as it recognizes the vast diversity in the students and a clear response in regards to working towards Truth and Reconciliation (TRC). It pushes teachers to provide learning opportunities that continue to build on and learn about other student identities and experiences (i.e., windows, mirrors and sliding glass doors). In this learning series, we explored the Footbridge Framework (from Resurgence) as an approach to explore Indigenous texts and use them authentically.
The Footbridge Framework: A means to become ‘story ready’
Firstly, it is important to note that the Footbridge Framework was authored by Christine M’Lot (Anishinaabe educator) and Katya Ferguson (early years teacher) both of whom reside in Manitoba. They both worked with other Indigenous contributors to construct this framework. The Footbridge Framework was formed to guide us to consider context, authenticity, representation and educator learning or reflections. Although it appears as a step-like process, the framework is actually represented in a thread-like structure; every story learning will branch out to different thinking and connections. The five stages of the Footbridge Framework allows you and your students to engage with Indigenous voices and texts with purpose and meaning. M’lot and Ferguson provided questions within each step to help educators work through the framework.
Preparing to Set Out (p. 12): In this step, time is encouraged to be spent on researching the author’s narrative, identity, other contributions and their relationship to place and their work. During this research, educators are encouraged to self-reflect and form personal connections and consider their own engagement with Indigenous texts and content (e.g., How do I bring Indigenous voices in the classroom? What learning do I need to do to support students?).
Leaving Shore and Cross the Bridge (p. 14-15): Educators decide the learning focus, and share the text with students. Educators move from initial engagement to deeper understanding of the theme by encouraging students to first form connections to self, community and then an inquiry. The authors shared that this will allow them to engage in critical thinking with relation to issues of power, and agency (p. 17). By asking students “What is the Author talking back against? What forms of oppression is the author talking back against?” it will allow students to explore the deeper meaning of Indigenous texts. Students can then explore specific tensions between Indigenous peoples and settlers using the various inquiry prompts outlined in the Resurgence text, thus determining what they want to inquire about further.
Reaching the Shore and Beginning a New Journey (p. 17): As educators and students reach the shore, M’Lot and Ferguson share that introducing other Indigenous resources will help guide students to return to the text with a new lens. It can also include reading a different Indigenous text to start a new journey.
In part two, I will share my experiences, and reflections for next time.
M’lot, C., & Adamov Ferguson, K. (2022). Resurgence: Indigenous narratives and expressions in the classroom. Portage & Main Press.
