This is the first of two posts where I’ll share insights related to helping students develop their critical consciousness. In this post, I’ll begin by providing some background information regarding how this topic emerged. I’ll then provide a definition of critical consciousness to ensure readers are familiar with the term, followed by some thoughts on how it is in some ways like critical thinking skills and in others different. I’ll conclude with a brief explanation of why I think students need to receive meaningful opportunities to practice developing their critical consciousness in schools.
At the start of the 2024/2025 school year, members of the central literacy team and I surveyed educators working with students in grades 4 and 5 on the type of professional learning they wanted to receive to support them in actioning the revised Language curriculum (Language curriculum). We chose to survey educators working with students in Grades 4 and 5 for one primary reason; due to a lack of human and financial resources available during the 2023/2024 school year, we recognized that educators working with these student populations received the least amount of professional learning from the central literacy team.
Wanting to ensure the professional learning offered best met educator needs, we conducted a brief survey to gain some insight to inform our planning. The survey included questions related to clarifying curriculum expectations, re-thinking assessment and evaluation practices, identifying and utilizing evidence-based instructional approaches, and support needed to apply culturally relevant pedagogical approaches to practice.
While reviewing the survey data, my colleagues and I found that over half of the educators indicated that they needed support in understanding how to apply culturally relevant pedagogical approaches to their practice. To be specific, educators indicated that they wanted support with understanding how to help students develop their critical consciousness.
As a quick reminder, culturally relevant pedagogy includes three big ideas. 1. Hold high academic expectations for students then put scaffolds in place to support them in meeting those expectations. 2. Encourage students to utilize and develop their cultural competence to engage and support their learning. 3. Support students in developing their critical consciousness. Gloria Ladson-Billings, the researcher who coined the term culturally relevant pedagogy in the 1990’s, defines critical consciousness in her article, But That’s Just Good Teaching! The Case for Culturally Relevant Pedagogy as helping students develop a broader sociopolitical consciousness that allows them to critique the cultural norms, values, moral attitudes, and institutions that produce and maintain social inequities. The other essential insight that is missing from Ladson-Billings definition yet captured in her work is that when students develop their critical consciousness, they come to realize that they can enter their reality to change it for themselves and others. Meaning they understand that they have the capacity to be agents of change, and they practice exercising that capacity in their daily lives.
In the glossary of the Language curriculum, critical thinking is defined as the process of thinking about ideas or situations to understand them fully, identify their implications, make a judgement, and/or guide decision making. Critical thinking includes skills such as questioning, predicting, analyzing, synthesizing, examining opinions, identifying values and issues, detecting bias, and distinguishing between alternatives.
When reading Ladson-Billings’ definition of critical consciousness in relation to the definition of critical thinking found in the glossary of the Language curriculum, I see some clear similarities. First, I recognize that they both call students to critique or strive to understand norms, values, and human issues. Second, they both include analysis and synthesis of concepts, information, and ideas.
Where they differ is that critical thinking alone may or may not lead to action whereas, understanding the importance of action and engaging in actions that effect change is an integral part of critical consciousness. Also, critical consciousness is very much connected to thinking about social justice issues that may or may not directly affect students yet are worthy of thought and actions to create more just and equitable local and global communities.
As a classroom teacher, I understand that a central part of my role in creating an effective program for students includes helping them understand how the learning they do in my classes adds value and meaning to their lives beyond the classroom and school. For me this means, supporting students in recognizing their capacity to effect positive change for self and others then providing meaningful opportunities for them to practice their agency by thinking critically about issues affecting their lives then working to nurture or change them.
In my next post, I’ll share an example of how I provided an opportunity for students to practice their critical consciousness along with insights I gained from the experience that may be useful to others.